HOME REMEDIES TO WHITEN YOUR TEETH

HOME REMEDIES TO WHITEN YOUR TEETH

Nov 18, 2020 by

HOME REMEDIES TO WHITEN YOUR TEETH

Teeth whitening is something that has gained popularity in recent times. Although it does not have any significant health benefits, a whiter tooth is often considered a sign of healthy oral hygiene. With time, teeth whitening has gained importance, due to its cosmetic impact.This has resulted in a rise in the popularity of teeth whitening products.

But, if we look back in history, this trend isn’t something we can call as new. Whiter teeth have always been a mark of status, standard, and oral hygiene. Along with dental beautification, whiter teeth gained popularity as it became a sign of sophistication. 

Before technology took over what did we fall back on for whiter teeth? As it turned out, nature has provided us with several remedies for dental discoloration. It is these hacks, tips, and remedies that traditional cultures used to get whiter teeth. Let us look at a few of those homemade remedies so that you can try them out yourself to experience healthy dental hygiene. 

  • Swishing Oil

This a popular and traditional method of teeth whitening, popular mostly in eastern cultures. This oil pulling method improves oral hygiene and is believed to remove toxins from the body as well. Swishing oils around the mouth remove the plague, causing bacteria and germs, preventing your teeth from turning yellow.

If you want to follow traditional methods, you can try sunflower oil or sesame oil as it is a popular choice according to Indian traditions. However, coconut oil is also a popular alternative as it has a pleasant taste and is known for its dental benefits. In fact, you can use any oil for this purpose.

This swishing oil method in your mouth helps reduce bacteria growth and prevent dental diseases and decay. This is effective against bacterias like Streptococcus mutans, often the root cause of dental problems like plaque formation and gingivitis.

Although you can try any oil for this purpose, coconut oil and sesame oil is preferred for their individual benefits. Even with science not proving the claim of oil pulling and swishing whitening your teeth, several people still practice this as it comes with several benefits, and people believe teeth whitening to be one of them.

While the high lauric acid in coconut acts as an anti-inflammatory remedy and anti-bacterial solution, sesame oil has proven to affect and reduce Streptococcus mutans in saliva in no time.

  • Baking soda Toothpaste

With natural teeth whitening properties, baking soda is a popular traditional remedy for teeth whitening. It has also found its way into commercial teeth whitening toothpaste. It is a useful product for scrubbing away surface stains of your teeth.

Its mild abrasive quality makes it a good and effective teeth whitener. Being alkaline, it neutralizes the acidic state in your mouth and prevents bacteria growth.

Although it won’t show effect immediately, it improves your dental health, which becomes noticeable over time. This benefit is loved by commercial toothpaste companies, as they use it to make their toothpaste effective against yellow stains. The sudden rise in popularity of baking soda in commercial toothpaste is also due to studies that revealed that toothpastes with baking soda are much more effective in removing plagues than toothpastes without it.

  • Activated Charcoal & Coconut

A key component in modern teeth whitening agents, activated charcoal and coconut, has been in use for ages. Although not scientifically proved, ancient cultures have believed that activated charcoal and coconut have teeth whitening benefits.

This became so popular that several cultures even used activated charcoal to brush their teeth. They believed that the use of activated charcoal could help them experience some noticeable changes.

With coconut already being an essential ingredient for maintaining dental health, modern toothpaste companies use these two products to make their product effective without any side effects.

While other companies use bleaches, peroxides, and chemicals to remove stains, products like Charcoal teeth whitening kit are based on naturally derived ingredients and are heavily dependent on providing their customers with whiter teeth without any side effects.

  • Finding the solution in Fruits & Vegetables

Fruits and vegetables improve your health in general. It also improves your dental health. But, you need to know which veggies and fruits to pick up as a few of them can cause your teeth to stain even more.

  1. Strawberries

    Did you know that most celebrity stylists suggest using strawberry and baking soda mix as a teeth whitening remedy?

It is mostly because strawberries contain malic acid, which has proven to be a significant ingredient in concoctions for dental discoloration removal.

The mixture of strawberry and baking soda is preferred by many as the baking soda buffs the stains away while the strawberry’s malic acid removes discoloration.

It is a strong tooth whitening mixture. This is why doctors often advise their patients not to use it too much or too frequently as it might damage your teeth.

  1. Pineapple

Pineapple contains bromelain, an enzyme that has proven to be effective in removing teeth stains. Although its effectiveness is not backed by science, Pineapple is a common ingredient in standard toothpastes.

Bromelain concentration in Pineapple is not quite strong. This makes Pineapple ineffective against underlying teeth stains as it can’t penetrate the enamel.

  • Watching What You Eat

This is an essential step, as most food items are often the cause of teeth stains. Watching what you eat and avoiding teeth-staining foods is something you should practice if you want whiter teeth.

The list of such food items includes coffee, red wine, soda, and dark berries.

Although several teeth whitening products are effective and have instant results, doctors often advise you against them as they contain harmful chemicals. It’s better to try these home remedies or try products like natural ingredients-based products Charcoalo teeth whitening kit. Teeth whitening products like Charcoalo teeth whitening kit are often recommended because they contain natural ingredients, making them extremely safe and effective while taking away the risk of damaging your enamel.

With all the best possible remedies laid out, you must keep in mind that there is no better alternative than brushing and flossing. Instead, they should never be underestimated as they are the key acts of maintaining your oral hygiene.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Galveston, Texas City ISDs supplied with rapid COVID tests

Galveston, Texas City ISDs supplied with rapid COVID tests

Nov 18, 2020 by

The federally supplied kits can detect coronavirus within 15 minutes of a sample being taken.

The Galveston Independent School District this week was among a few that received a COVID-19 prevention tool Texas Gov. Greg Abbott promised last month — tests that can diagnose a COVID-19 infection within 15 minutes of being administered.

Although Galveston ISD has received its free shipment of 2,000 rapid tests, other local school districts still are on a waiting list for devices.

The Galveston school district planned to begin offering tests to students and staff members displaying COVID-19 symptoms at its on-campus health clinics. Fifteen people received rapid tests Thursday, officials said.

The tests would enable administrators to make quicker decisions if the virus is detected inside a school, officials said.

“Rapid tests are reliable and allow us to quickly identify contagious individuals in order to make swift decisions about treatment,” said Dr. Richard Rupp, the medical director at the district’s teen health centers.

“The earlier we can make decisions the better, and we are grateful that we now have the ability to determine if someone is positive for COVID-19 within a matter of minutes.”

The Galveston school district is one of at least two districts in the county to receive the rapid tests. The Texas City Independent School District also recently received a shipment of about 1,200 tests, district spokeswoman Melissa Tortorici said.

The Santa Fe Independent School District has requested the COVID tests but had not received a shipment by Thursday, a spokeswoman said. The Dickinson Independent School District said it did not request any tests from the state. The Clear Creek Independent School district didn’t respond to a question about the rapid tests.

As of Thursday afternoon, the Texas Education Agency had supplied 717,625 rapid tests to 339 school systems, including private schools, the agency said.

Abbott announced in October that the state would make rapid tests available to schools wanting them and introduced a pilot program that includes eight school districts. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services provided the test kits to the state.

The kits are part of a promise the federal health department made in August to distribute 150 million rapid tests nationwide. The kits contain antigen tests, which are faster than PCR tests — the kind of test available at sites such as the University of Texas Medical Branch — but are less able to detect low levels of the virus.

The tests arrived in Galveston a week after the school district canceled in-person classes at one of its middle schools because of a case of COVID-19 identified in a single student. The number of close contacts the student had with teachers and staff prompted the school district to close Central Middle School and switch all of its student to virtual learning until contact tracing and thorough cleaning could be completed at the school.

In-person classes had resumed Wednesday for most students at the school. The district kept seventh-grade students off campus, however, because too many teachers still were quarantined after close contact with the infected student.

The district couldn’t find enough substitute teachers to cover the entire grade, spokesman Billy Rudolph said.

Seventh-grade students will not return to in-person class until Nov. 19 at the earliest, Rudolph said.

Despite the quarantines, no infections have been reported connected to the COVID-positive student, Rudolph said.

Most local school districts began returning to in-person classes in August. Since then, there have been no widespread outbreaks of COVID-19 connected to students, teachers or school staff in the county.

As of Thursday, there were 1,004 active cases of COVID-19 in Galveston County, according to the Galveston County Health District. Of those, 104 cases were in people younger than 20 years old, according to the health district.

Source: Galveston, Texas City ISDs supplied with rapid COVID tests | Local News | The Daily News

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

LAWSUIT VICTORY: UCLA admits to violating the law after stonewalling open records request for over a year

LAWSUIT VICTORY: UCLA admits to violating the law after stonewalling open records request for over a year

Nov 18, 2020 by

It took 404 days, five extensions, and a lawsuit for the University of California, Los Angeles to fulfill a single open records request.

Today, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education announces a victory in the lawsuit — filed to remind UCLA and public institutions around the country that they have a moral and legal obligation to fulfill public records requests.

“It shouldn’t take over a year and litigation to get 13 pages of documents from a public university,” said FIRE Director of Litigation Marieke Tuthill Beck-Coon. “The people of California deserve far better from the institutions they fund.”

The Superior Court of California entered judgment in FIRE’s favor on Oct. 20, ruling that UCLA’s handling of a 2018 records request from FIRE violated the California Public Records Act. As part of the resolution, UCLA admitted that it violated the law by failing to fulfill the request for over a year.

FIRE’s suit stemmed from a 2018 speaking engagement by U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin. On Feb. 28, 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that Mnuchin “retracted his permission” for UCLA to release a video of his speaking appearance at a campus forum two days earlier. During the appearance, several protesters were escorted from the facility, leading to five arrests.

Seeking to learn more, FIRE issued a public records request to UCLA on March 2, 2018 for a copy of the video and any communications about its release, as well as any agreements between Mnuchin’s office and UCLA about the secretary’s appearance. UCLA publicly posted the video to its website on March 9, but failed to release any of the other requested documents. Instead, UCLA responded to FIRE with a succession of emails repeatedly awarding itself extensions — five in all — before FIRE filed a lawsuit on March 27, 2019.

UCLA finally handed over the 13 pages of requested documents on April 10, 2019 — more than 13 months after FIRE filed its original request.

The California Public Records Act requires that public institutions like public colleges make copies of public records “promptly available,” and not delay the production of records. By stipulating to the judgment entered by the Superior Court of California, UCLA admitted that it violated the CPRA by failing to make the documents promptly available to FIRE and unlawfully delayed its response.

FIRE was represented by Kelly Aviles of the Law Offices of Kelly Aviles and FIRE attorneys Beck-Coon and Greg H. Greubel. FIRE is grateful to Aviles for her excellent work on our behalf and her dedication to governmental transparency.

UCLA, like many public institutions, has a checkered history with fulfilling public records requests. The Daily Bruin, UCLA’s independent student newspaper, houses a database on its website listing unfulfilled requests to the university.

“With this suit fresh in their minds, we encourage UCLA to finally fulfill the Daily Bruin’s many ignored requests for documents,” said Beck-Coon. “Government actors like UCLA can’t ignore the law and let records requests languish indefinitely. This lawsuit is proof of that.”

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at America’s colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience — the essential qualities of liberty.

Source: LAWSUIT VICTORY: UCLA admits to violating the law after stonewalling open records request for over a year

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Economic Freedom of North America 2020

Economic Freedom of North America 2020

Nov 18, 2020 by

Economic Freedom of North America 2020

Economic Freedom of North America 2020 is the sixteenth edition of the Fraser Institute’s annual report. This year it measures the extent to which—in 2018, the year with the most recent available comprehensive data—the policies of individual provinces and states were supportive of economic freedom, the ability of individuals to act in the economic sphere free of undue restrictions. There are two indices: one that examines provincial/state and municipal/local governments only and another that includes federal governments as well. The former, our subnational index, is for comparison of individual jurisdictions within the same country. The latter, our all-government index, is for comparison of jurisdictions in different countries.

For the subnational index, Economic Freedom of North America employs 10 variables for the 92 provincial/state governments in Canada, the United States, and Mexico in three areas: 1. Government Spending; 2. Taxes; and 3. Labor Market Freedom. In the case of the all-government index, we incorporate three additional areas at the federal level from Economic Freedom of the World (EFW): 4. Legal Systems and Property Rights; 5. Sound Money; and 6. Freedom to Trade Internationally; and we expand Area 1 to include government investment (variable 1C in EFW), Area 2 to include top marginal income and payroll tax rate (variable 1Dii in EFW), and Area 3 to include credit market regulation and business regulations (also at the federal level). These additions help capture restrictions on economic freedom that are difficult to measure at the provincial/state and municipal/local level.

Results for Canada, the United States, and Mexico

The all-government index
The all-government index includes data from Economic Freedom of the World (Gwartney, Lawson, Hall, and Murphy, 2020) which is only available on the national level. These data enable us to make better comparisons among Canadian, Mexican, and US subnational jurisdictions by taking into account national policies that affect all jurisdictions within each country. Canada and the United States have similar scores in the EFW report and are both are typically in the top 10 nations. Mexico ranks much lower, at 68th this year, though that is an improvement over past years.

The top jurisdiction is New Hampshire at 8.16, followed by Florida and Idaho at 8.10 , then Wyoming (8.09) and Utah (8.08). Alberta is the highest ranking Canadian province, tied for 9th place with a score of 8.06. The next highest Canadian province is British Columbia in 27th at 7.98. Alberta had spent seven years at the top of the index but fell out of the top spot in the 2018 report (reflecting 2016 data). In 2015, Albertans elected new political leaders who made changes in taxation, spending, and regulation that had a negative effect on economic freedom. In 2019, Albertans elected politicians who reversed the course of policy and it will be interesting to see what impact this will have on the province’s level of economic freedom in future years.

The highest-ranked Mexican state is Jalisco with 6.70, followed by Tlaxcala (6.66) and Mexico (6.62). They are nearly a full point behind those ranking lowest in Canada and the United States, although that gap has been shrinking. The lowest-ranked state is Ciudad de México at 5.77; slightly better are Colima at 5.95, and Tamaulipas at 6.20.

The four lowest-ranked Canadian provinces are all within less than one tenth of a point of each other and are behind all 50 US states. The province of Newfoundland & Labrador and nearby Prince Edward Island are tied for 59th with 7.61, just behind Nova Scotia (58th) at 7.66, and New Brunswick (57th) at 7.67. The lowest-ranked states in the United States are Delaware at 7.72 in 56th place, following Rhode Island (7.76 in 54th) and New York (7.77 in 53rd).

Historically, average economic freedom in all three countries peaked in 2004 at 7.70 then fell steadily to 7.21 in 2011. Canadian provinces saw the smallest decline, only 0.20, whereas the decline in the United States was 0.48 and, in Mexico, 0.59. Since then it has risen slowly to 7.40 but still remains below that 2004 peak. However, economic freedom has increased in the United States and Mexico since 2013. In contrast, in Canada, after an increase in 2014, it has fallen back below its 2013 level.

The subnational indices
For the purpose of comparing jurisdictions within the same country, the subnational indices are the appropriate choice. There is a separate subnational index for each country. In Canada, the most economically free province in 2018 was again Alberta with 6.61, followed by British Columbia with 5.98, and Ontario at 5.16. However, the gap between Alberta and second-place British Columbia continues to shrink, down from 2.28 points in 2014 to 0.63 in 2018. The least free by far was Quebec at 2.84, following New Brunswick at 4.08, and Nova Scotia at 4.20.

In the United States, the most economically free state was New Hampshire at 7.84, followed by Florida at 7.73. Virginia is third at 7.62; Texas is fourth at 7.61; and Tennessee is fifth at 7.55. (Note that since the indexes were calculated separately for each country, the numeric scores on the subnational indices are not directly comparable across countries.) The least-free state was New York at 4.25, following West Virginia at 4.50. Alaska was 48th at 4.67, California was 47th at 4.71, and Vermont was 46th at 5.08.

In Mexico, the most economically free state was Jalisco at 6.57. Michoacán de Ocampo was second at 6.39, followed by Baja California at 6.04. The least free Mexican states were Zacatecas at 2.77, Campeche at 2.78, and Tabasco at 3.44

In addition to the tables found in chapter 3, our new interactive website at www.freetheworld.com contains all the latest scores and rankings for each of the components of the index as well as historical data on the overall and area scores. The full dataset is also available for download at that same website.

Economic freedom and economic well-being at the subnational level
The jurisdictions in the least economically free quartile (one fourth) on the all-government index had, in 2018, an average per-capita income of just US$2,277, compared to US$50,645 for the most economically free quartile. On the subnational index, the same relationship holds, with the least-free quartile having an average per-capita income 8.1% below the national average, while the most-free quartile was over 4.6% above it.

In addition, economic freedom at the subnational level has generally been found to be positively associated with a variety of measures of the per-capita size of the economy and the growth of the economy as well as various measures of entrepreneurial activity. There are now more than 310 articles by independent researchers examining subnational economic freedom using the data from Economic Freedom of North America. (Appendix C lists some of the most recent ones.) Much of that literature discusses economic growth or entrepreneurship but the list also includes studies of a variety of topics such as income inequality, eminent domain, and labor markets. The vast majority of the results correlate higher levels of economic freedom with positive outcomes, such as economic growth, lower unemployment, reduced poverty, and so on. The results of these studies tend to mirror those found for these same relationships at the country level using the index published in Economic Freedom of the World.


More from this study

Source: Economic Freedom of North America 2020 | Fraser Institute

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welfare checks and hotspots: how a school district is fighting to keep kids in class amid Covid

Welfare checks and hotspots: how a school district is fighting to keep kids in class amid Covid

Nov 18, 2020 by

In West Contra Costa unified school district, pandemic-era problems like spotty internet access are driving absenteeism

Alicia Karnsouvong spent the first weeks of the fall semester going to Starbucks coffee shops and local libraries to find a strong enough wifi signal for her sons to sign into their online classrooms.

Karnsouvong had an internet connection at her Richmond, California, home, but it was spotty and unable to handle the increased use that came with daily digital learning. Setting up a time for someone to come fix her connection was almost impossible.

“We tried to reboot it, my first grader tried to log in on my phone, we tried to go to Starbucks and the library but all the other people who had wifi issues were going to the same places as me. It was hard.”

Bouncing from location to location made the mother of three “feel homeless”.

Karnsouvong was also struggling in other ways. She works as a hairstylist and was out of work in the first months of the pandemic because of the Bay Area’s strict coronavirus restrictions. While the lockdown brought financial strain, the time off gave Karnsouvong a chance to spend time at home and set up a makeshift classroom for her sons in first and second grade, and her 12-year-old brother.

By the start of the school year in August, though, Richmond salons had reopened and Karnsouvong was back at work. She cut her hours by more than half to be home with the children, and was seeing clients later in the evening. But fixing the wifi issue proved a daunting challenge.

Karnsouvong requested a school district-issued wifi hotspot, but by the time she received it the county had already classified her seven-year-old son as chronically absent.

“He was still doing the work, and I contacted the school several times about the wifi, but they still sent me a truancy letter.” Karnsouvong recalled. “I was mad because it made me look like I was a bad parent.”

Source: Welfare checks and hotspots: how a school district is fighting to keep kids in class amid Covid | US news | The Guardian

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

The DEA Wants Access To 131 Million Prescription Records

The DEA Wants Access To 131 Million Prescription Records

Nov 18, 2020 by

Allowing federal agents to monitor anyone’s prescription records without a warrant is a recipe for disaster.

By MassPrivateI

Back in 2017 I reported on how the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) Prescription Monitoring Program was tracking 60 percent of Americans personal information and prescriptions.

But now an article in Filter Mag revealed that the DEA wants unlimited access to millions of Americans’ prescription records.

The DEA is looking to expand its anti-diversion surveillance infrastructure by being able to search and analyze myriad patient behaviors for the vast majority of controlled and scheduled drug prescriptions—all accompanied by a rapid process for legally unveiling personally identifying information.”

In early September, the agency requested proposals for the creation of software capable of searching at least 85 percent of all US residents’ controlled-substance prescriptions for certain patient behaviors, as well as prescriber and pharmacist practices.

The DEA wants to give their agents “unlimited access to patient de-identified data” on re/filled prescriptions, daily supply, payment type, dosing information and gender.”

The “de-identified” data the DEA will have access to includes things like a patients, gender, age group, city, state, zip code and the number of instances of more than one Schedule II prescription drug at the same address. It also includes things like the distance between a patient and the pharmacy.

The DEA’s Prescription Monitoring Program would let at least 1,100 DEA agents have access to the so-called de-identified patient prescription data simultaneously and it would also have a streamlined subpoena process. (Pages 11 and 13 of the DEA’s Proposal for Pharmacy Prescription Data in Filter Mag.)

Why would the DEA want to give 1,100 agents access to “de-identified” patient subscription data and why would they want a streamlined subpoena process if they could not identify individuals?

According to a 2016 NPR article the DEA could be monitoring 119 million Americans taking prescription drugs.

Nearly half of all Americans over the age of 12 take prescription pain relievers, tranquilizers, sedatives or stimulants, according to a federal survey. And 16 percent of the time those drugs are misused by nearly 19 million Americans. Health officials are calling for more drug treatment, but also for more care in prescribing drugs in the first place.

The national survey on drug use revealed that at least 119 million Americans took painkillers, tranquilizers, stimulants and sedatives.

The DEA wants access to 131 million Americans’ prescription information

A more recent study by Georgetown University’s, Health Policy Institute claims that at least 66 percent of the population or 131 million Americans are on prescription drugs.

More than 131 million people — 66 percent of all adults in the United States — use prescription drugs. The great majority of adults who have one of five common chronic conditions — diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, arthritis, and cancer — use prescription drugs.

Whichever figure is correct, 119 million or 131 million, the obvious question everyone should be asking is, why does the DEA need access to millions of elderly Americans’ prescription information?

The proportion of people using prescription drugs and the amount of prescriptions filled varies by demographic group. Prescription drug use is associated with age, gender, race and ethnicity, income, and health status. For example, prescription drug use increases with age. Three-quarters of those age 50 to 64 use prescription drugs, compared to 91 percent of those age 80 and older. The average number of prescriptions filled also increases with age, from 13 for those age 50 to 64 to 22 for those age 80 and older.

Who in their right mind believes that millions of elderly Americans taking prescription drugs should be treated like suspected criminals? Yet that is exactly what is happening. When the Feds are allowed to create and use a surveillance program masquerading as a prescription monitoring program, no one is safe, not kids, teenagers or the elderly.

Welcome to post 9/11 where the Feds treat everyone taking prescription drugs like a suspect.

As Filter Mag warns, the DEA has a history of exploiting administrative subpoenas to build a mass surveillance apparatus. The DEA’s 343 million license plate database is a perfect example of how the DEA has secretly created a national license plate surveillance network.

Allowing the DEA to scrutinize the percentage of patients receiving opioids, Buprenorphine or Oxycodone scripts is horrifying. If you have ever had to fill a prescription or pick up one for a family member, you know that they record your ID and all your personal information.

“The impact of including buprenorphine will be appalling for people’s health,” Dr. Hannah Cooper, the chair of substance use disorder research at Emory University

Exploring the impact of prescription drug monitoring programs

Allowing federal agents to monitor anyone’s prescription records without a warrant is a recipe for disaster.

The idea that patient-level data is available to the DEA is quite frightening. We don’t want to make people worry that their decisions will be monitored by this highly punitive federal agency,” said Cooper. “If you’ve been inhabiting a space where you’ve been persecuted by the federal government for some time, and they now have access to your private medical information, there will be tremendous consequences for population health and health equity.

Here’s one example of how law enforcement could abuse monitoring 131 American’s prescription records. Imagine being involved in an automobile accident or being arrested for protesting police abuse, etc. Now imagine what would happen when the District Attorney subpoena’s your prescription drug history. Can you guess what the outcome would be once a judge and or jury is told about your prescription drug history?

This is just one example of how everyone’s lives could be affected by a federal prescription monitoring program.

Source: The DEA Wants Access To 131 Million Prescription Records – Activist Post

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pandemic Thanksgiving

Pandemic Thanksgiving

Nov 18, 2020 by

Eight days from today is Thanksgiving and the pandemic’s insult to our collective serenity abides. Our intimate family settings will be carried out under a pall of restrictions as we focus compellingly on gratitude and compulsively on mass discontent. We are antsy for respite.

In past years, I’ve urged readers to boycott on Thanksgiving those establishments that don’t close on the holiday or give their employees a paid day off with bonus money if they choose to work. After all, if fast-food restaurants like McDonald’s are hungrier for a buck than a ravenous customer for a burger, they should be chastened.

They’d claim that they’re actually performing a public service and that any resulting profit is incidental to their commercially ingenious policy for addressing the epidemic of isolation in the City where so many people are alone and without a place to go for emotional succor or feast.

But in 2020, with so much unemployment contributing to our misery and with even the most prosperous chains under economic siege, we should patronize them and bear gifts, even if just in the form of a verbal expression of appreciation, to their workers. Protesting their being open for business on Thanksgiving would not be consistent with the wish to see them thrive or at least minimally sustained for the good of their labor force.

Perhaps on Thanksgiving 2021, we will again witness the greed of a fast-food restaurant chain staying open to rake in the coupons of their competitors that are closed out of respect for the holiday and its workers. Maybe the surrounding world will allow for a reversion to the Game of Corporate Thrones. But for now and for Christmas next month, let those grub syndicates be the beneficiaries of our open wallets.

The decision to close or stay open does not affect only restaurants. The same principle applies to any box store. Let’s make this year the “blackest of “Black Fridays”!

PC Richard, the “appliance giant” started the trend of closing their stores on Thanksgiving many years ago, in deference to the wholesome sentimentality of the occasion. It has a tonic effect on one’s outlook to witness a business showing humanity as at least a partial contributing motive for their actions.

For instance, the now defunct J and R store, located near the World Trade Center, reportedly continued to pay its employees for an extended period of time after they were forced to close in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks.
New Yorkers should confer the blessing of their purchases on proprietors who generously compensate their workers, not only in salary but also the “psychic wage”. In most years, that would entail their being padlocked on Thanksgiving so that their employees can bond with family and friends and practice the values that the holiday represents and do so without fear of discouragement.

In this Year of the Virus, it almost amounts to a charitable policy to keep their stores open for business. But in doing so, there should still be no coercion of employees to clock in and no favoritism shown to those who sacrifice a Thanksgiving at home to report to work.

And employees should get double their hourly pay. Not because it is required by law, because it isn’t. But out of the spirit of decency that we all need in mega-doses during this protracted season of tribulation.

Ron Isaac

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

The Dystopian “Fourth Industrial Revolution” Will Be Very Different from the First One

The Dystopian “Fourth Industrial Revolution” Will Be Very Different from the First One

Nov 18, 2020 by

Antony P. Mueller

If one takes the publications of the World Economic Forum (WEF) as an indication of how the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” will change society, the world is facing a massive onslaught against individual liberty and private property. A new kind of collectivism is about to emerge. Like the communism of the past, the new project appeals to the public with the assurance of technological advancement and social inclusion. Additionally, ecological sustainability and the promise of longevity or even immortality are used to entice the public. In reality, however, these promises are deeply dystopian.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution

According to Klaus Schwab, the founder and current executive chairman of the WEF, the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” (2016) represents a new stage of the disruptive technological advances that began toward the end of the eighteenth century with the textile industry and the use of steam power. The Second Industrial Revolution took place in the decades before and after 1900. It created a plethora of new consumer goods and production technologies that allowed mass production. The third Industrial Revolution began around 1950 with the breakthroughs in digital technologies. Now, according to Klaus Schwab, the fourth Industrial Revolution means that the world is moving toward “a true global civilization.”

The fourth Industrial Revolution provides the potential “to robotize humanity, and thus compromise our traditional sources of meaning—work, community, family, identity.” Schwab predicts that the fourth Industrial Revolution will “lift humanity into a new collective and moral consciousness.”

Transhumanism is part of the transformation that comes with the fourth Industrial Revolution, as artificial intelligence (AI) will surpass even the best human performances at specific tasks. The new technologies “will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us—they will become part of us, Schwab declares.

In the foreword to Schwab’s latest book, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (2018), the CEO of Microsoft, Satya Nadella, states that the evolution of the new technologies “is entirely within our power.” Microsoft and the other high-tech companies “are betting on the convergence of several important technology shifts—mixed reality, artificial intelligence and quantum computing.”

Satya Nadella informs readers that Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Facebook, and IBM will cooperate in an AI partnership that will work to develop and test the technology in fields such as “automobiles and healthcare, human-AI collaboration, economic displacement, and how AI can be used for social good.”

All-Embracing Transformation

In the preface to his latest book, Klaus Schwab predicts that the fourth Industrial Revolution will “upend the existing ways of sensing, calculating, organizing, acting and delivering.” He states that “the negative externalities” of the present global economy harm “the natural environment and vulnerable populations.”

The changes that come with the new technologies will be comprehensive and will topple “the way we produce and transport goods and services.” The revolution will upset how “we communicate, the way we collaborate, and the way we experience the world around us.” The change will be so profound that the advances in neurotechnologies and biotechnologies “are forcing us to question what it means to be human.”

Like Satya Nadella’s foreword, Schwab’s text reiterates several times the claim that the “evolution of the fourth Industrial Revolution” is “entirely within our power” when “we” use the “window of opportunity” and drive for “empowerment.” The “we” that both authors speak of is the global technocratic elite that calls for central control and state interventionism (called “shaping the future”) in a new system that is characterized by intimate cooperation between business and government, or, more specifically between high tech and a handful of key states.

The World Economic Forum’s webpage about the “Great Reset” proclaims that “the Covid-19 crisis” presents “a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery.” At the present “historic crossroads,” the world leaders must address “the inconsistencies, inadequacies and contradictions” ranging from healthcare and education to finance and energy. The forum defines “sustainable development” as the central aim of the global management activities.

The “Great Reset” calls for global cooperation to attain goals such as “harnessing the fourth Industrial Revolution,” “restoring the health of the environment,“ “redesigning social contracts, skills, and jobs,” and “shaping the economic recovery.” As thematized at the October 20–23, 2020, “Jobs Reset Summit,” a “green recovery” from the covid-19 crisis promises a “green horizon.” The WEF summit in January 2021 will specifically address the transformations that are to come. The main topics include “stable climate,” “sustainable development,” a “zero carbon” economy, and agricultural production that would reduce cattle farming in tune with the global reduction of meat consumption.

The Alternative

The rise of living standards together with the growth of the world population became possible because of the Industrial Revolution. Those who want to bring down capitalist society and the economy must necessarily opt for declining living standards and depopulation. The promoters of the plans to bring about a new world order with the force of the state negate that radical capitalism could much better provide the means to move to a better world, as has been the case since the inception of the First Industrial Revolution.

What brought about the industrial revolutions of the past were free markets and individual choice. As Mises explains, it was the laissez-faire ideology that produced the First Industrial Revolution. There was a spiritual revolution first that brought an end to “the social order in which a constantly increasing number of people were doomed to abject need and destitution” and where the manufacturing activity “had almost exclusively catered to the wants of the well-to-do” and their “expansion was limited by the amount of luxuries the wealthier strata of the population could afford.”

The ideology of the World Economic Forum is that of the preindustrial era. While the website of the forum (WEF) teems with terms like “power,” “organization,” and managed “sustainable development,” concepts like “freedom,” “market coordination,” and “individual choice” are blatantly absent. The forum hides the fact that instead of human progress, impoverishment and suppression is the future of humankind. The implicit consequence of the planned “ecological economy” is the drastic reduction of the world population.

With the abolishment of markets and the suppression of individual choice, which the collectivist plans of the WEF propound, a new dark age would come. Different from what the planners presume, technological progress itself would come to a standstill. Without the human creativity that springs from the mindset of individualism, no economic progress has ever been possible.

Conclusion

The new technologies that come with the fourth Industrial Revolution can be of immense benefit to humankind. The technologies per se are not the problem but how they are used. A dystopian future awaits us if the global elite of the World Economic Forum has its say. The result would be a technocratic terror regime masked as a benevolent world government. Yet there is an alternative. As widely proven over the past two hundred years, free markets and individual choice are the sources of technological advancement, human progress, and economic prosperity. There are no rational reasons to presume that the fourth Industrial Revolution would require collectivism. Free markets are the best way to cope with the challenges that come with new technologies. Not less but more capitalism is the answer.

Author:

Antony P. Mueller

Dr. Antony P. Mueller is a German professor of economics who currently teaches in Brazil. Write an email. See his website and blog.

Source: The Dystopian “Fourth Industrial Revolution” Will Be Very Different from the First One | Mises Wire

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

George Mason U. professor finds Bible, reports it to ‘bias’ hotline

George Mason U. professor finds Bible, reports it to ‘bias’ hotline

Nov 18, 2020 by

Classified the episode as ‘discrimination’ and ‘harassment.’

In November 2019, a George Mason University professor stumbled upon a Bible and an accompanying CD in her classroom. The professor collected the items and immediately reported the items to the school’s Bias Incident Reporting Team, which classified the episode as “discrimination” and “harassment” against “religion.”

The professor accompanied her report with photographs of the Bible, and the items were collected by the Bias Team.

The incident was one of 12 filed with the school’s bias reporting website between January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2020 and obtained by The College Fix through an open records law request. The documents provided by the university were redacted to protect the privacy of students involved.

The reports were obtained as The Fix continues to investigate the types of complaints that are lodged through bias response teams at college campuses across the nation. Nearly two dozen universities have been included in the investigation so far since it launched in 2019.

According to George Mason’s Campus Climate website, students and professors are encouraged to report and “act of discrimination, harassment, intimidation, violence or criminal offense committed against any person, group or property that appears to be motivated by prejudice or bias.”

According to the school, “bias” could mean “negative feelings and beliefs with respect to others race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age social class, political affiliation, disability, veteran status, club affiliation or organizational membership.”

“Such bias incidents may be intentional or unintentional and affect the individual or Mason community,” according to the school’s bias reporting website.

“Our bias reporting and response protocols appropriately balance our efforts to strive for a bias free environment while protecting the individual rights to free speech,” said GMU spokesman Michael Sandler in an e-mail to The Fix.

“Our policies have been vetted by university counsel and have been endorsed by free speech advocates outside the university,” said Sandler, adding, “Mason also has the highest rating from The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), which rates universities on their ability to protect students and faculty members rights to free speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty and sanctity of conscience.”

In a September 2019 incident, a student reported a communications professor for asking the student to give up an accommodation that allowed them to turn in assignments late. The student said the professor made them feel “very unsafe” because she implied the student was “taking advantage of disability services.”

The professor then allegedly asked the student what the special accommodation was for, which the student said “is not something that I feel comfortable sharing.”

“She also pulled my [study] partner out of the room and tried to pressure her into making me present,” said the student. “My partner currently has a concussion and the professor claimed that she was faking,” reported the student.

“I feel that this teacher has a pattern of discrimination which goes against George Mason’s code of ethics,” the student wrote. “I feel that she is not a safe person to have in the classroom,” reported the student.

The student said among those notified were the GMU Compliance, Diversity and Ethics Office, the Office of Disability Services, and “all my friends.”

In another incident, a student in the multi-cultural/multil-lingual education program overheard two middle-aged women in the admissions office discussing their frustration with so many students waiting until the last minute to turn in their transcripts. One of the women allegedly said she was particularly frustrated with international students who used excuses like time differences and language barriers to ask for filing extensions.

“The adviser then went on to say that she felt that the international students just plagued the various advisers and offices looking for the answers they wanted, not the answers they were given,” reported the student, adding “She said that if an exception is made for any international student, then they will come to expect it, because they talk together.”

“This sort of discrimination and prejudice from the university’s own admissions office is completely egregious and unacceptable,” wrote the student. “It is also entirely unprofessional that these employees were having this conversation in a public area in front of other students,” the student said, adding they now feel “extremely uncomfortable and unwelcome” at George Mason University.

Other reports filed with the school included:

· At a Presidential Search Community Session in October 2019, a transgender student rose to offer an opinion and ask a question. The student said the leader of the search committee “cut me off before I could finish my question and very aggressively and very condescendingly confronted me, in front of the entire room, about my question without providing an answer.”

“I could not help but notice that the only trans woman in the room was silenced while others were allowed to go on, essentially as long as they wanted to,” reported the students, adding, “To me, this incident very clearly displayed an act of casual, if not outright, transphobia.”

The student never reported the question asked or the opinion offered.

· In November, a group of campus police officers began asking students in the Mason Global Center if they could recognize a thin black man in a photo taken by a security camera. According to one student, “It was clear to me that he was insinuating that he wanted me to direct him to anyone matching the suspect’s description, no matter if I was sure it was them or not.”

“It was an extremely uncomfortable situation that was not only undoubtedly rooted in racial discrimination, but one that makes the entire community very discontent [sic]” the student reported.

· A student complained that the Facebook group “GMU GeneralPosting” is “well known for its systemic bias against African Americans and other POC.”

Updated to include a statement sent by a George Mason University spokesman after the article was originally published.

MORE: Student files bias complaint after dry-erase message fails to refer to MLK as ‘doctor’

Source: George Mason U. professor finds Bible, reports it to ‘bias’ hotline | The College Fix

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

‘Woke’ Leftists: School District Makes Decision That Asian Students Are Not Considered ‘Students of Color’

‘Woke’ Leftists: School District Makes Decision That Asian Students Are Not Considered ‘Students of Color’

Nov 18, 2020 by

Wait, what?

When is your minority group no longer non-white? Apparently when your academic performance is just too good.

In an equity report from 2019 that was promptly removed after it was first reported on this week, the North Thurston Public Schools in Thurston County, Washington, measured “White/Asian Students” against “Students of Color” in order to ascertain any performance gap. The report also looked at “Students of Poverty” against “Non Poverty” students.

“Students of Color compares outcomes for Asian and White students [with students] who identify as Black, Latinx, Native American, Pacific Islander, and Multi-racial students, all of whom have experienced persistent opportunity gaps in our society,” the report read.

“Students of Poverty is a visualization of opportunity gaps for students experiencing poverty, as measured by qualification for free or reduced price meals.”

TRENDING: State Department Official Admits To ‘Shell Games’ That Kept Trump in Dark About Real Troop Levels

Even with that crude attempt to play around with the data, the report didn’t find many significant gaps between white/Asian students and students of color, with only two major indicators — third-grade language arts test scores and sixth-grade math test scores — being over 10 percent.

According to Fox News, the district, 55 miles south of Seattle, is responsible for 16,000 students.

Reason’s Robby Soave drew attention to the equity report in a Monday article.

“What the equity report really highlights is the absurdities that result from overreliance on semi-arbitrary race-based categories,” he wrote.

“The report also measured ‘students of poverty’ —those who qualify for free or reduced-cost lunches — against non-poverty students, and unsurprisingly found a much more significant achievement gap. ‘Students of poverty’ perform 28 percent worse on math tests, for instance. That socioeconomic category captures something real and meaningful in a way that the gerrymandered race category does not.”

A paragraph earlier, Soave made the point a different way:

“Most indicators in the report show that the achievement gap between white/Asian students and ‘students of color’ is fairly narrow and improving over time. It would probably be even narrower if Asian students were categorized as ‘students of color.’ In fact, some indicators might have even shown white students lagging behind that catch-all minority group. Perhaps Asians were included with whites in order to avoid such an outcome.”

The superintendent of the school system didn’t respond to a request for comment from Reason — so we don’t know how the district might respond to Soave’s hypothesis that “some indicators might have even shown white students lagging behind that catch-all minority group” if Asians were removed.

Instead of responding, the district removed the report, and issued a statement on its website that claims the purpose behind it was closing gaps between underperforming groups of students.

“For this reason, in one of our online documents from 2019, titled ‘Monitoring Student Growth,’ we evaluated the achievement data by ‘Students of Color’ and ‘Students of Poverty.’ In the document we grouped White and Asian students together.

“Upon reflection and response by members of the Asian-American community, we will change how we look at achievement data and appreciate the feedback we received. We apologize for the negative impact we have caused and removed the monitoring report from our website.”

First off, the notion that this decision involved “reflection” is risible. The Reason report was published Monday. The district replaced the chart and issued its statement the same day.

So a few hours, at most, of careful contemplation played an integral role in administrators coming to the carefully measured realization that a year-old report was problematic in how it dealt with Asian-American students.

Leaving that absurdity aside, this should have been sufficient.

However, the types of administrators prone to issuing that kind of equity report in the first place are also the same kind of people prone to performative self-sabotage, and the statement curdled into a non-apology apology, as the district maintained it was “important to continue the practice of disaggregating data, so we make equity-based decisions.”

“When we reviewed our disaggregated data it showed that our district is systemically meeting the instructional needs of both our Asian and White students and not meeting the instructional needs for our Black, Indigenous, Multi-racial, Pacific Islander and Latinx students,” the statement read.

“The intent was never to ignore Asian students as ‘students of color’ or ignore any systemic disadvantages they too have faced.”

The last part is decidedly untrue unless you want to admit the categories in the equity report are wholly arbitrary. If this is what they meant, it’s what they should have said when this report was originally published.

Instead, this feels closer to one of the more pernicious biases in modern education: The idea that Asian-Americans are successful enough academically that they’re not really a minority.

Consider Harvard, where being Asian is negatively correlated with admission and Asians aren’t considered a minority for admissions purposes, according to a 2018 report from The New York Times. Documents from a 2014 lawsuit against the university for its race-based admittance practices also asserted Asian students were systematically rated lower on personality traits by admissions interviewers.

And yet, the courts have thus far sided with Harvard. According to National Review, a federal judge in Boston found October 2019 decision that “[r]ace is only intentionally considered as a positive attribute” in Harvard’s admission policies, while conceding that “[r]ace conscious admissions will always penalize to some extent groups that are not being advantaged by the process.”

The ruling was upheld by the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals last week, and is likely headed to the Supreme Court.

That’s at the higher end of the food chain, though. At the lower end, you have the North Thurston Public Schools, which is so concerned about equity among what they call “Students of Color” that it decided Asians didn’t fit in that category.

Source: ‘Woke’ Leftists: School District Makes Decision That Asian Students Are Not Considered ‘Students of Color’

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.