In Rick Hess’s eyes, President Barack Obama has a big choice to make.
“The president campaigned with a different face of education reform than what he championed during the first term,” Hess, an influential education scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, said in an interview. “I’m curious as to whether what he said on the campaign trail is more reflective of what a second term will be or whether the first term will be reflected in the second term.”
In other words, Barack Obama was reelected Tuesday night with huge support from teachers’ union members that have so publicly clashed with his policies. He got that vote, in part, by stressing the softer part of his education agenda on the campaign trail. In speeches and debates, he sparred with Mitt Romney over the federal government’s role in hiring teachers — since Obama spent billions on teacher hiring as part of the stimulus bill — and the importance of class sizes.
But Obama’s first term also saw the creation of the Race to the Top program, which angered unions by requiring participating states to evaluate teachers based on student test scores. His rhetoric toward teachers was tough during his first term, but softened as reelection approached. So which Obama will we see?
It’s a question teachers are asking, with some hoping to see a course correction.
“With the election behind us, it is time for the Obama administration to step back from its education policy and access whether its foundation is sound and supported by evidence,” Stevens Institute of Technology professor Arthur Camins wrote on a Washington Post blog. “It is a moment to summon the courage to change course.” Camins continued to argue against a focus on standardized testing and firing underperforming teachers.
“My worst fear is it’ll continue to be the same,” said Diane Ravitch, a New York University historian and one of Obama’s most vitriolic critics on education. “His education policy is indistinguishable from Mitt Romney’s, aside from vouchers. It’s based on test test test test.”
While Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, is one of the union presidents who helped reelect Obama, she has similar reservations. “We’re going to be out there pushing to end the fixation on testing and displace that fixation with a fixation on teaching, to fight to fix and not close public schools, but to make public schools the centers of community,” she said.
Maybe Obama has been having it both ways all along, said Alexander Russo, a blogger and former congressional education aide. “They’ve figured out how to give resources to education and on a separate track, push for reform, and doing those things separately but simultaneously wins them the reluctant allegiance of teachers and career educators who want schools to be better funded and reformers who want schools to have better outcomes,” he said.
The policies, Ravitch says, have been confusing. “The president sends out mixed messages,” she said. “He says he doesn’t want teachers teaching to the test, and that he likes that his daughter’s school doesn’t focus to the test, but I wish someone can get across the idea to him that he should want that for other children.”
Though some teachers took to Twitter to call for the ouster of Obama’s education secretary Arne Duncan, that probably won’t happen. Obama and Duncan are basketball buddies — with Duncan, a former pro Australian player, even playing against Obama on Election Day — and Obama has expressed pride in Duncan’s accomplishments. And Duncan once told HuffPost that he would stay for eight years if asked. On Thursday, Politico speculated that if Duncan does leave, he would be replaced by Michelle Rhee, a former Washington, D.C. schools chancellor. Choosing Rhee, a lightening rod in education policy, would signify a return to the harder-line Obama rhetoric on education — but administration insiders say that is highly unlikely. Duncan was not available for comment Thursday.
Dennis Van Roekel, president of the National Education Association, said he expects the second term to focus on early and higher education — topics that are less polarizing within the administration’s own base. That focus also resonated with Education Week reporter Alyson Klein. Speaking on a Thursday American Enterprise Institute panel, Klein said she expects the administration to focus on higher education because it gave states waivers from the expired No Child Left Behind law — and would prefer to see those waivers used, rather than encourage a congressional overhaul of the law.
Obama’s education-related campaign promises were modest — he pledged to create 100,000 new math and science teachers, 2 million more community college slots, and to cut tuition in half over 10 years. Hess called most of these promises “vacuous campaign rhetoric.” It will be hard for Obama to fund all these promises, Hess said, as the country dangles over a fiscal cliff. Hess said, “folks hoping for new outlays would be well advised to temper their expectations.”
Obama Education Policy: Second Term Direction Still Not Clear.
Related posts:
- Diane Ravitch, the Anti-Michelle-Rhee In the month of April, Diane Ravitch, the...
- Duncan, Rhee starring at our-hearts-belong-to-data summit By Valerie Strauss - The king and queen of data-driven...
- Arne Duncan: ‘Everybody won’ in Chicago teacher strike but kids VIDEO Secretary of Education Arne Duncan spoke at the National Press...
- Conversations with Obama, Duncan on assessment By Carol Corbett Burris and Kevin G. Welner - We...
- Conversations with Arne Duncan by Kevin Welnar & Carol Burris – We can’t say...
- Arne Duncan backs gay marriage and will push it public schools Another top Obama administration official appeared to break with the...
- Will Arnie Duncan jack boot states refusing the Fed’s Common Core Standards? Shorter Arne Duncan: The U.S. Department of Education is not...
- Education reformer Michelle Rhee tells her side Michelle Rhee, the former Washington, D.C., schools chancellor, might very...
- Arne Duncan to Override ‘No Child Left Behind’ Requirement Sam Dillon Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has announced that...
- Dear Michelle Rhee: About that teacher evaluation study By Valerie Strauss - Dear Michelle Rhee, former D.C. schools...
November 9, 2012 at 8:00 AM
The education policies we have are the result of NCLB, which is/was a rotten piece of legislation. Saddled with a law that was written by either morons, or persons antagonistic to public education, the Obama administration has sought ways to up the ante and give the law more punch, in his RttT, an equally pernicious law. For some reason, when criticizing Duncan and Obama on this (and they deserve this and more), the critics seem to forget that NCLB was Bush IIs accomplishment and the driver of what has occurred in the past 4 years.
We need to get rid of Duncan, he is useless. We need someone who has actually logged classroom time (for more than 2 years) and who understands the complexity of issues that we are struggling with. Of course, Bush had Spellings, an “earth mother” or whatever she called herself, someone who never taught, either, but who did breastfeed her children.
We need someone who has strong credentials, teaching experience and a scholarly command of the multitude of issues.
Many teachers voted for Obama, but not because they like his education policies.
November 10, 2012 at 6:48 PM
Surely the mention of Rhee as a possible replacement for Duncan was simply a wicked attempt at satire.
November 10, 2012 at 7:38 PM
I don’t love Duncan, either, but your use of Michelle Rhee in the headline, when she’s mentioned in one paragraph, as unlikely, is disingenuous. Hard to take your points seriously, when you appear to be more interested in driving traffic to your site.